Redline Recovery Services LLC, 11675 Rainwater Drive, Suite 350, Alpharetta, GA 30009 seems to be at it again. They are quickly falling into the rogue collector bucket if they keep up the behavior alleged in the lawsuits below.
Well now a Florida woman has claimed that she had retained a lawyer to represent her with her debt and a Mr. Stewart from Redline Recovery Services called her and left her a message pretending to be the manager of her lawyers office. Not cool.
A quickie search of lawsuits against Redline shows that 2009 was a busy year for them being sued.
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 11/16/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 09/10/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 10/22/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 03/19/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 06/05/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 12/08/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 09/14/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES LLC – 12/15/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. – 01/15/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. – 12/16/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 12/18/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 01/26/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 12/30/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 09/18/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 02/04/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 05/07/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 07/30/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 07/06/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 03/31/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 03/26/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 07/23/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 07/10/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 08/25/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 10/20/2009
REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC – 08/14/2009
From one of the lawsuits against Redline Recovery Services:
12. The Defendants telephoned the Plaintiff up to six times a day.
13. One of the Collectors, who identified himself as Chris Koslowski, screamed at the Plaintiff and said, “You’re a deadbeat!”
14. The Defendants threatened to garnish the Plaintiff’s wages.
15. The Defendants sometimes made telephone calls without disclosing the identity of the collection agency.
16. Renee told the Defendants to stop calling her but they continued to do so.
17. The Defendants also contacted the Plaintiff’s neighbors regarding the Debt.
18. In addition, the Defendants telephoned the Plaintiff’s father-in-law almost every day, and as often as three time per day, despite already having the Plaintiff’s contact information.
19. In telephone conversations with the Plaintiff’s father-in-law, the Collector again identified himself as Chris Koslowski. The Collector said he was looking for the Plaintiff regarding a debt that she owed.
