February 23, 2006
Tens of Millions of Consumer Credit and Debit Card Numbers Compromised
In the largest known compromise of financial data to date, CardSystems Solutions, Inc. and its successor, Solidus Networks, Inc., doing business as Pay By Touch Solutions, have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that CardSystems’ failure to take appropriate security measures to protect the sensitive information of tens of millions of consumers was an unfair practice that violated federal law. According to the FTC, the security breach resulted in millions of dollars in fraudulent purchases. The settlement will require CardSystems and Pay By Touch to implement a comprehensive information security program and obtain audits by an independent third-party security professional every other year for 20 years.
This is the ninth FTC case targeting companies whose security practices compromised consumers’ confidential financial information, and the first the Commission has brought against a credit card processor.
“CardSystems kept information it had no reason to keep and then stored it in a way that put consumers’ financial information at risk,” said Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman of the FTC. “Any company that keeps sensitive consumer information must take steps to ensure that the data is held in a secure manner.”
According to the FTC, CardSystems provided merchants with products and services used in “authorization processing” – obtaining approval for credit and debit card purchases from the banks that issued the cards. Last year, it processed about 210 million card purchases, totaling more than $15 billion, for more than 119,000 small and mid-size merchants. In processing these transactions, CardSystems collected personal information from the magnetic strip of the card, including the card number, expiration date, and other data. CardSystems then stored this information on its computer network. Pay By Touch acquired CardSystems’ assets in December 2005, and now processes transactions for the same merchants CardSystems served.
The FTC charged that CardSystems engaged in a number of practices that, taken together, failed to provide reasonable and appropriate security for sensitive consumer information. Specifically, the agency alleges that CardSystems:
According to the FTC’s complaint, these practices compromised millions of credit and debit cards, and led to millions of dollars in fraudulent purchases. In addition, after the fraud was discovered, banks cancelled and re-issued thousands of credit cards, and consumers experienced inconvenience, worry, and time loss dealing with the affected cards.
The proposed settlement requires CardSystems and Pay By Touch to establish and maintain a comprehensive information security program that includes administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. The settlement also requires them to obtain – every two years for the next 20 years – an audit from a qualified, independent, third-party professional that confirms that its security program meets the standards of the order, and to comply with standard bookkeeping and record-keeping provisions.
This case is similar to prior FTC actions involving alleged failures to secure credit and debit card information. As in the prior cases, CardSystems faces potential liability in the millions of dollars under bank procedures and in private litigation for losses related to the breach.
September 8, 2006
Release of Commission report:
The Commission, with the concurrence of the Acting U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, has authorized the release of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Report to Congress Regarding the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Premerger Notification Program. The report summarizes Commission and Department of Justice (DOJ) actions conducted under the HSR Act in fiscal year 2005, noting that 1,695 premerger filings were received – 17 percent more than the 1,454 filings received in fiscal year 2004. The report also describes the HSR Act and provides a historical overview of how the federal antitrust agencies have implemented the Act since its enactment in the late 1970s.
Agreement Containing Consent Order
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order
Decision and Order
Letter – to Edward P. Finnerty
Letter – to Russel W. Schrader
Letter – to Richard A. Painter