“Dear Steve,
I’ve been to my 3rd lawyer about BK. This is the one I used 10 yrs ago for my 1st BK. His fee is $2800 for a chap 7, $1k to retain him. I asked him if it would be better w/chap 13 since than I can get rid of my 1st mortg. as well. He seemed to think that it would be more costly that way and if I stopped paying my 2nd, they wouldn’t foreclose anyway, because in order to do so they would have to pay off the 1st at $160k just to get their $25k. What are your feelings on this and does it make any sense?
Can I ignore my 2nd mortgage when filing chap 7?
Justin”
The Answer:
Dear Justin,
Hum, interesting question.
I suppose you could ignore the second to address the current issues. So technically the answer is probably yes.
But I did want to share my gut reaction to this strategy, yuck.
Maybe it is just me, I prefer solutions that address the issue at hand and allow someone to move on afterwards. With this approach it seems like you’d address a lot of your other debt concerns but you’d have this second mortgage, now in default, hanging out there waiting for you. I don’t know about you, but just knowing that liability was out there would leave me wondering when that shoe would drop.
Please update me on your progress by posting updates here in the comments section of your question. I’m very interested in how this works out for you.
P.S. Be sure to read ‘The Secret of Surviving Through Difficult Economic Times. What I Learned On My Journey‘.
If you have a credit or debt question you’d like to ask just use the online form. I’m happy to help you totally for free.