CFPB Complaint

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. – CFPB Complaint ID 2477346

Consumer Complaint Submission

Date Received: 2017-05-05T00:00:00

Product: Mortgage debt

Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed

Consumer Consent Provided to Share Complaint: Consent provided

Consumer Complaint: This complaint stems from a decade-old foreclosure case, and specifically involves the attempted collection of a ‘dormant ‘ mortgage debt. Ohio law is crystal clear that when a debt is not ‘executed upon ‘ or ‘renewed ‘ within a five-year period, the debt is considered dormant, and the lien is extinguished. Ohio law further defines the ‘execution ‘ of debt to as ” a process of court, issued by its clerk, and directed to the sheriff of the county. ” ( R.C. 2327.01 ). In my case, there was no ‘execution ‘ as defined above, nor a ‘certificate of judgment ‘ renewed during the period of time from XX/XX/XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX . As such, the Summary Judgment issues by the Court of Common Please became dormant on XX/XX/XXXX . Nonetheless, on three occasions since that time – specifically XXXX XX/XX/XXXX , XX/XX/XXXX , and XX/XX/XXXX – the alleged Plaintiff in my case – XXXX XXXX XXXX – allegedly acting under direct orders from Select Portfolio Servicing, INC – filed a Praecipe Order of Sale with the Court in what amounts to an attempt to collect a debt that I currently do not owe as a result of the statutorily-imposed dormancy .
In addition, SPS itself has attempted more than 50 separate collection activities during the time since the judgment became dormant including sending letters to me, making phone calls, and even attaching a note to my door. Nearly all of these activities occurred after I properly disputed the debt, and the note on my door occured after I specifically requested that SPS ‘cease and desist ‘ collection activities since the debt remains unvalidated to this day. The specific statute is Ohio Revised Code 2329.07, which codifies when a Judgment may become dormant : ( A ) ( 1 ) If neither execution on a judgment rendered in a court of record or certified to the clerk of the court of common pleas in the county in which the judgment was rendered is issued, nor a certificate of judgment for obtaining a lien upon lands and tenements is issued and filed, as provided in sections 2329.02 and 2329.04 of the Revised Code, within five years from the date of the judgment or within five years from the date of the issuance of the last execution thereon or the issuance and filing of the last such certificate, whichever is later, then, unless the judgment is in favor of the state, the judgment shall be dormant and shall not operate as a lien upon the estate of the judgment debtor. One bankruptcy judge has explained the operation of these statutes as follows from In re XXXX , XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX ( XXXX . XXXX Ohio XXXX ) : Ex ecution and dormancy statutes are to be strictly construed. XXXX v. XXXX , XXXX Ohio XXXX XXXX , XXXX , XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX ( Ohio XXXX ) ; XXXX XXXX . XXXX XXXX XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX XXXX XXXX . XXXX XXXX , XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX ( XXXX ) ; XXXX XXXX . XXXX , XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX ( Okla. XXXX ). Section 2329.07 sets forth the only means in Ohio for preventing a judgment from becoming dormant. The clear language of the statute requires the issuance of execution or a certificate of judgment before expiration of the original five-year period to prevent dormancy. Section 2329.07 provides that in order to extend the effectiveness of a judgment beyond the initial five year period there must be either execution or the issuance of a new certificate of judgment before expiration of the original execution or certificate of judgment.
As a result of the above, the law is clear that the judgment is dormant, and any action to collect on the debt is a violation of state and federal law.

READ  Navient Solutions - CFPB Complaint ID 3075774

Company: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.

State/Zip: OH 444XX

Company Response to Complaint: Closed with explanation

Was Company Response Timely: Yes

Did Consumer Dispute Company Response: N/A

Complaint ID: 2477346

The above data is from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Keep in mind that every company will get a complaint from time-to-time, even the great ones. But there are a few key data points that will give you an idea about how well the company values their customers and handles consumer issues.

Look at the item Company Response to Complaint: and Did Consumer Dispute Company Response: to get a better idea of how this was resolved. And the field Consumer Complaint: can give you some context of the issue.

In particular what you are looking for was that the company response was timely and that the consumer did not dispute it. The posting of complaints has proven to be a valuable resource for both companies and consumers.




About the author

Research Department

Here is where you will find important stories located from around the web which can impact you and your financial life.

Scroll to Top