Disabled Man Sues Judgment Recovery Partners and Others for Illegally Seizing Social Security Benefits

Case Information:

  • Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
  • Case Number: 1:25-cv-2075
  • Filed: March 12, 2025
  • Plaintiff: Andrey Alishayev
  • Defendants: Judgment Recovery Partners LLC (JRP), Tyler Umans, James W. Olsen, River Heights Capital, LLC

Allegations at a Glance:

Andrey Alishayev, a disabled man who relies solely on Social Security Disability Income (SSDI), alleges that debt collectors unlawfully restrained and seized nearly $9,000 from his bank account. Despite clear proof that the funds were exempt from collection, Defendants refused to release the money for over five months, causing him financial hardship and severe emotional distress.

Key Allegations:

  • Defendants obtained a default judgment against Alishayev 14 years ago through a fraudulent affidavit of service.
  • In March 2024, JRP restrained Alishayev’s bank account, freezing $8,997.90.
  • Alishayev provided immediate proof that all funds were from SSDI and legally exempt from collection.
  • JRP ignored the evidence, demanded unnecessary documentation, and falsely told him he needed to hire a forensic accountant.
  • In April 2024, Chase Bank transferred the restrained funds to the marshal, who contacted JRP to confirm whether to return the money. JRP instructed the marshal to send the money to them instead.
  • Alishayev spent months filing pro se motions in court and seeking help from the New York Attorney General before finally recovering his money in October 2024.
  • JRP and attorney James W. Olsen allegedly engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in New York by using Olsen’s digital signature to issue legal enforcement documents.

Legal Claims:

✅ Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) Violations – 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (Unfair, deceptive, and abusive debt collection practices)
✅ Conversion – Wrongfully taking and withholding Plaintiff’s money

Relief Sought:

💰 Actual damages for financial harm
💰 Statutory damages under the FDCPA
💰 Punitive damages for reckless and willful misconduct
💰 Attorneys’ fees and costs

The Bottom Line:

This case highlights the potential for abusive debt collection practices and the misuse of legal procedures to collect on old debts. Consumers receiving Social Security or other exempt income should be aware of their rights and act quickly if their funds are wrongfully restrained.

Legal Disclaimer:

Lawsuits contain allegations that have not been proven in court. The Defendants may contest the claims, and the case may result in dismissal, settlement, or a ruling in favor of either party.

author avatar
Research Department Automated Research
The Research Department provides clear, fact-based summaries of newly filed legal complaints, highlighting key case details, allegations, and legal claims. These reports focus strictly on the claims made in court filings and do not include responses from defendants. Committed to neutrality and readability, the Research Department ensures that legal disputes are documented in an accessible, structured format without speculation on case outcomes. 📌 Important Note: Lawsuits are allegations and may be dismissed, settled, or withdrawn.

Leave a Comment