Quick Answer: Nina Mortellito, 86, lost nearly $700,000 in life savings to a scam that tricked her into converting her money to gold bullion over nine months. Despite dramatic changes in her withdrawal patterns, three banks—Merrill Lynch, TD Bank, and UBS—failed to intervene. She’s now suing all three for negligence.
I feel for every victim of scams like these. It could be our parents, our grandparents, or maybe one day it could even be me. But I’m always left wondering: how much control do we want to give banks over our money? And how much responsibility do we need to take—or have someone we trust take—to prevent this kind of thing?
It’ll happen again tomorrow, and the next day, and the next day.
What Happened to Nina Mortellito
According to a lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, Nina Mortellito is an 86-year-old Upper East Side resident who suffers from age-related memory loss. Between August 2023 and May 2024, scammers drained nearly $700,000 from her accounts at three different banks.
Each weekday I send one short email: one story that caught my attention, why it might matter to you, and one manageable thing you can do with it. A couple of minutes, and a dad joke.
In the latest issue (Oct 16): The check that looks like a scam may be real
Free. I sell nothing. Unsubscribe any time.
It started with a pop-up warning on her computer claiming her bank accounts had been compromised. The scammers convinced her that the only way to protect her money was to convert everything into gold bullion.
The Daily Money Brief — Free, at 10 AM
Money you may be owed, scams to dodge, and the fine print decoded — the consumer money news that affects your wallet, every weekday.
Over nine months, according to Yahoo Finance reporting on the case, she:
- Withdrew approximately $275,000 from her Merrill Lynch accounts
- Wired $150,000 from TD Bank to a gold dealer in Texas
- Mailed a $30,000 check at the scammers’ direction
- Took out more than $100,000 from her UBS accounts
The Red Flags the Banks Missed
Here’s what makes this case so maddening. According to the lawsuit:
For over 30 years, Mortellito’s withdrawals never exceeded $5,000. Her niece had been added as a co-trustee in 2022 specifically because of concerns about her vulnerability. Yet when she suddenly started pulling out tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars—none of the three banks raised a single red flag.
That’s the core of the lawsuit. Attorney Robert Georges of Konta Georges & Buza PC stated: “The banks need to take reasonable steps to protect their customers, especially the elderly, who are uniquely susceptible to online scammers.”
Her nephew-in-law, Stephen Kuhn, said: “We are extremely disappointed the banks have not acted according to reasonable professional standards… We are left with no choice but to bring this lawsuit, which we hope will bring real change to the banks’ policies and procedures.”
This Is a $28 Billion Problem
Nina Mortellito is one of millions of elderly Americans targeted by financial scams every year. The numbers are staggering:
- The FBI’s 2024 data shows older Americans lost $4.9 billion to fraud—a 43% increase from 2023
- Researchers estimate the true annual cost of elder financial exploitation at $28.3 billion when unreported cases are included
- Financial institutions filed 155,415 suspicious activity reports related to elder exploitation in a single year
And in December 2024, the CFPB, Treasury, and FinCEN issued a joint interagency statement urging banks to do more to protect elderly customers. The agencies called for better coordination between financial institutions, law enforcement, and adult protective services.
The Hard Question
This story raises a question nobody has a clean answer for: who’s responsible?
How much control do we want to give banks over our money? And how much responsibility do we need to take for ourselves—or have someone we trust watching over us?— Steve Rhode
On one hand, it’s your money. You should be able to access it. Banks shouldn’t be paternalistic gatekeepers who second-guess every withdrawal.
On the other hand, when an 86-year-old woman who has never withdrawn more than $5,000 suddenly starts making $50,000+ transactions—and she has a co-trustee on the account specifically because of cognitive concerns—that should trigger something. A phone call. A pause. A notification to the co-trustee.
The Case for Bank Intervention
- Banks have fraud detection systems specifically for unusual activity
- A co-trustee was on the account for this exact reason
- 30+ years of consistent behavior suddenly changed
- Federal agencies are calling on banks to do more
The Counter-Argument
- Account holders have the right to access their money
- Where does protection end and control begin?
- Banks can’t verify the reason for every withdrawal
- Scammers coach victims on what to say to bank employees
What You Can Do to Protect Your Family
If you have elderly parents or grandparents, here’s what I’d suggest based on what this case teaches us:
- Add a trusted contact to their financial accounts—most brokerages and banks now allow this under FINRA Rule 4512
- Set up transaction alerts so someone is notified when large withdrawals happen
- Talk about scams openly—especially pop-up warnings, phone calls claiming their accounts are compromised, and gold/crypto conversion pitches
- Consider a power of attorney if cognitive decline is a concern, before a crisis forces the issue
- Report suspected exploitation to FBI IC3 and your local Adult Protective Services
Dealing With Financial Fallout? If a scam has left you or a family member in a debt crisis, the situation isn’t hopeless. Take the free Find Your Path quiz to get a personalized starting point for recovery.
Key Takeaways
- Nina Mortellito, 86, lost nearly $700,000 to a scam that convinced her to convert savings to gold bullion
- Three banks—Merrill Lynch, TD Bank, and UBS—processed dramatic, out-of-character transactions without intervention
- She’s suing all three for negligence, arguing they failed their duty to protect a vulnerable customer
- Elder fraud losses hit $4.9 billion in 2024, and the true cost may be $28.3 billion annually
- Add trusted contacts and set up alerts on elderly family members’ accounts now—before it’s too late
FAQ
Can banks be held liable for elder fraud?
It depends on the circumstances and jurisdiction. The lawsuit against Merrill Lynch, TD Bank, and UBS alleges negligence—that the banks failed to take reasonable steps to protect a vulnerable elderly customer when red flags were clearly present, such as dramatically unusual withdrawal patterns and a co-trustee arrangement.
How common is elder financial fraud?
It’s widespread and growing. The FBI reported $4.9 billion in losses from elder fraud in 2024, a 43% increase from the prior year. Researchers estimate the true annual cost at $28.3 billion when unreported cases are included.
What is a trusted contact on a financial account?
A trusted contact is someone a financial institution can reach out to if they suspect exploitation or have concerns about an account holder’s mental capacity. Under FINRA Rule 4512, brokerage firms are required to request trusted contact information. This person cannot access the account but can be notified of suspicious activity.
What should I do if I suspect elder financial exploitation?
Report it immediately to your local Adult Protective Services, the FBI’s IC3, and the financial institution involved. Contact local law enforcement if the exploitation is ongoing. Time matters—banks can sometimes freeze or recover funds if notified quickly.
(Source: East Side Feed | Yahoo Finance/Moneywise)
Dealing With Debt? Understanding your options is the first step. See how all your debt relief options compare — including ones most sites won’t tell you about. The Find Your Path quiz gives a recommendation based on your actual numbers, and the Scam-O-Meter checks any company’s complaint history before you sign. Federal Reserve research shows bankruptcy filers recover faster than those who don’t file.
