Quick Answer: The Sweet v. McMahon student loan settlement just cleared its biggest remaining legal hurdle. On July 17, 2026, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a lower court ruling and rejected the Department’s request to reopen the settlement, confirming that more than 170,000 “post-class” borrowers whose applications missed the settlement’s own decision deadlines are entitled to automatic full relief — complete loan discharge, refunds of past payments, and deletion of the loan from their credit reports. That 170,000 figure is different from the roughly 200,000 borrowers designated for automatic relief under the original 2022 settlement, and different again from the total universe of people the case has touched over the years. If you filed a borrower defense application over school misconduct between 2015 and November 2022, this ruling is worth five minutes of your attention.
Expert Context: I’ve helped people navigate debt relief settlements and claims since launching GetOutOfDebt.org in 2008, and I’ve watched enough class-action “final” deadlines get relitigated to know which ones actually stick. This one just stuck — and after three straight losses on the same argument, it is hard to see how the Department gets another bite. The Ninth Circuit didn’t just deny another delay request; it rejected the specific legal argument the Department kept recycling to ask for more time.
The Department of Education tried three times — the district court, the Ninth Circuit’s stay request, and now the merits appeal — to avoid delivering relief it agreed to when it signed the settlement in 2022. It lost all three. A rehearing petition or a Supreme Court appeal are technically still open to the Department, but neither pauses the relief already back in force.
Key Terms Defined
Borrower defense to repayment: A federal right that lets you get a loan discharged if your school lied to you or broke certain laws to get you to enroll.
Post-Class Applicant: Under the Sweet settlement, someone who filed a borrower defense application after June 22, 2022 — the date the original class closed — but before the court gave the settlement final approval on November 16, 2022. This is a distinct, separately-defined group — not the same as the original class, which the court certified as everyone who had a borrower defense application pending as of June 22, 2022. (The case was filed in 2019, but class membership is set by that 2022 date, not by when the lawsuit started.)
Rule 60(b)(5): The federal court rule the Department used to try to get out of the settlement, which requires proof of a “significant change” in facts or law since the deal was signed. The Ninth Circuit found the Department had none.
Full Settlement Relief: Complete discharge of the covered loan balance, a refund of every payment made on it, and removal of that loan’s tradeline from your credit report.
What the Ninth Circuit Actually Ruled on July 17
Here’s what actually happened, straight from the seven-page memorandum opinion itself (Case No. 26-1136, Sweet v. McMahon, 9th Cir.). The court marked it “not for publication,” meaning it is not binding precedent in other cases — but it is still a final, binding decision in this specific case, which is what matters if you are one of the borrowers waiting on it. The Department of Education asked the appeals court to let it out of the deadlines it agreed to when it signed the 2022 settlement, arguing that the number of “Post-Class” borrower defense applications — filed in the five-month window between the settlement’s signing and the court’s final approval — turned out to be an unforeseen “changed circumstance” that made the deal unfair to keep enforcing.
The panel — Judges Wardlaw, Owens, and Bress — wasn’t persuaded, for a simple reason: the government’s own numbers proved it wasn’t a surprise. The court noted the Department knew there were approximately 179,000 Post-Class Applicants when it jointly asked the district court for final approval of the settlement in September 2022, and knew the count had grown to more than 205,000 by February 2023 — nearly three years before it filed its first motion to get out of the deal. “The DOE failed to show ‘a significant change either in factual conditions or in law’ that would warrant modification of the Settlement,” the court wrote, and affirmed the district court’s decision in full.
This was the Department’s third loss on essentially the same argument — first at the district court, then when the Ninth Circuit refused to pause enforcement back in March 2026, and now on the merits. According to the Project on Predatory Student Lending (PPSL), the nonprofit legal group that has represented the Sweet class since 2019, “courts at every level — including the Supreme Court — rejected” the Department’s repeated attempts to delay.
The Daily Money Brief — Free, at 10 AM
Money you may be owed, scams to dodge, and the fine print decoded — the consumer money news that affects your wallet, every weekday.
Two Different Numbers You’ll See Everywhere — And Why They Don’t Mean the Same Thing
If you read three articles about this ruling, you’ll probably see three different borrower counts. That’s not sloppy reporting — it’s because Sweet v. McMahon has always covered several distinct groups of people, and this week’s news is really about only one of them.
The Claim: “500,000 people just got their student loans wiped out.”
The Reality: That headline figure — used by Forbes to describe the overall scope of the settlement — is a media estimate of everyone the case has ever touched, not a count of people affected by this specific ruling. Here’s the breakdown, sourced directly to PPSL and the court record:
- ~200,000 borrowers were designated for automatic full relief under the original 2022 settlement (the “Automatic Relief Group”), because they attended one of the “Exhibit C” schools with the strongest evidence of misconduct (ITT Tech, Corinthian Colleges, the Art Institutes, and others). That relief was due by January 28, 2024 — and PPSL has since had to push the Department to actually deliver it to everyone in this group too.
- 170,000+ additional borrowers are the ones this week’s ruling is actually about — “Post-Class” applicants who applied between June 23 and November 16, 2022, and whose applications the Department simply never decided by its own deadline (January 28, 2026 for Exhibit C schools, April 15, 2026 for everyone else). This is the number that confuses people, so let me be precise: the 170,000+ is a subset of the 205,000+ total Post-Class applicants the Ninth Circuit said the Department had already counted by February 2023. The difference is that some of those 205,000 did get a decision in time. The 170,000+ are the ones still sitting undecided when the clock ran out — which is exactly why they now get relief automatically.
- 271,000+ borrowers had already received some form of relief under the settlement as of May 2025, according to PPSL’s own case tracker — a number that’s grown further since.
- 750,000+ borrowers have asserted a borrower defense claim of some kind since 2015 — the entire pool the case grew out of, most of whom are not part of the Sweet class at all.
I can’t independently verify Forbes’ 500,000 figure against a court document or a PPSL statement, so I’m not going to repeat it as settled fact — I’m telling you where it came from and what the confirmed numbers actually are. What PPSL itself will say on the record: this ruling, combined with the settlement’s overall size, makes Sweet “the largest-ever settlement against the U.S. federal government, and the largest class-action settlement in American history,” now totaling at least $23 billion.
Who Is Actually Covered — And Who Just Thinks They Are
This is the part that trips people up every time one of these rulings makes news. Not everyone who owes federal student loans, and not everyone who was scammed by a school, is part of this settlement.
- Check your filing DATE first — it decides everything. If you filed a borrower defense application for federal loans on or before June 22, 2022, you are in the original Sweet class. If you filed between June 23 and November 16, 2022, you are in the “Post-Class” — the group this particular ruling is about. Those two groups are not treated the same, so don’t skip this step.
- Original class members: if your school is on the settlement’s Exhibit C list, you were designated for automatic full discharge (most should already have received it). If your school is not on Exhibit C, you are owed a decision on the merits under the settlement’s deadlines — that is not the same as automatic relief, and assuming otherwise is the most common mistake I see with this case. There is a backstop most people miss, though: under the settlement, if the Department blows its own deadline to decide your case, you become entitled to Full Settlement Relief within one year of that missed deadline. Having your decision go missing is not the same as having it go against you.
- Post-Class members — filed June 23 to November 16, 2022, still undecided — are the group this ruling confirms for automatic relief.
- You are NOT covered by this settlement if you filed AFTER November 16, 2022. That cutoff is hard. A later application sits in the Department’s standard borrower-defense queue under its current rules — different standards, no automatic relief, and none of these deadlines apply to you. Watch StudentAid.gov, and if your school is facing broad findings of misconduct, ask a legal aid clinic whether you have separate claims.
- You’re NOT covered if your loans are private student loans, not federal Direct or FFEL loans. Private loans require a different approach entirely, and this settlement can’t touch them. If your loans are FFEL rather than Direct, though, don’t rule yourself out — the class the court certified expressly covers anyone who “borrowed a Direct Loan or FFEL loan.” The wrinkle is on the refund side, not the eligibility side: PPSL’s guidance notes that commercially-held FFEL loans face limits on getting past payments refunded unless they were consolidated into a Direct Consolidation Loan. Discharge and refund are two different questions here.
- You’re NOT automatically covered if you never filed a borrower defense application at all. The right still exists — you can apply for free at studentaid.gov/borrower-defense — but you’d be starting under the standard process, not this settlement’s deadlines.
- You may have a harder path if you already received a denial. PPSL’s guidance is to check StudentAid.gov for a reconsideration option, and to forward any denial to info@ppsl.org.
What “Automatic” Really Means in Practice
“Automatic” is doing a lot of work in every headline about this case, and I don’t want to oversell it. Automatic means you don’t have to file anything new or fight for it — it does not mean it happens the moment the ruling is announced. Based on PPSL’s own published timeline:
- If you’re a Post-Class applicant from an Exhibit C school who didn’t get a decision by January 28, 2026, you should have received an eligibility notice around March 30, 2026.
- If you’re a Post-Class applicant from a non-Exhibit C school who didn’t get a decision by April 15, 2026, you should have received your eligibility notice by June 15, 2026.
- Once you have that notice, the Department has up to one year to actually deliver the discharge, the refund, and the credit correction. (I broke down these exact deadlines in more detail back in April, before either deadline had passed.)
And “automatic” hasn’t meant “smooth.” PPSL’s own case page reports that more than 1,000 members of the Sweet class are still waiting for relief that was legally due months — in some cases nearly a year and a half — ago, and on June 18, 2026, PPSL sent the Department of Education a formal Notice of Material Breach over exactly that. Separately, PPSL’s own guidance for class members warns that some borrowers have been placed back into repayment status by their loan servicer despite being entitled to forbearance while their case is pending. If that happens to you: don’t start paying based on what a servicer tells you over the phone. Email sweet@ed.gov (copy info@ppsl.org) with your name and borrower defense application number, and get it in writing before you send a dollar.
The Tax Wrinkle Almost Nobody’s Mentioning
Here’s something I haven’t seen in the coverage of this ruling, and it matters: whether your Sweet discharge is tax-free depends heavily on when it lands. The American Rescue Plan Act’s blanket exclusion for student loan forgiveness — the rule that made most discharges tax-free from 2021 through 2025 — expired December 31, 2025, and was not extended. Per the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service, if your loan forgiveness is processed in 2026, you generally have to report it as income on your 2026 return. There is one opening, and I want to quote it exactly rather than oversell it: if you were notified in 2025 that your loan was eligible for forgiveness, you “may not have a tax liability, even if the loan forgiveness was not fully processed until 2026.” Read the word may. That is not a guarantee, and I would not plan a tax year around it without putting the question to a professional who can see your actual return.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness, Teacher Loan Forgiveness, and death/disability discharges remain permanently tax-free regardless of this expiration. Borrower defense discharge isn’t on that short exempt list. That doesn’t mean you’re guaranteed a tax bill — if your total debts exceeded your total assets at the time of discharge, you may be able to exclude some or all of it under the insolvency rule by filing IRS Form 982. I wrote a full breakdown of this exact rule change in June, and I’d rather you find out about it from me now than from a 1099-C next January. Talk to a tax professional before you assume either way.
Key Takeaways
- The Ninth Circuit’s July 17, 2026 ruling affirmed the district court and rejected the Department’s Rule 60(b) motion outright — a rehearing petition or Supreme Court appeal is technically still possible, but neither would pause the relief now back in force.
- 170,000+ “Post-Class” borrowers (applied June 23–Nov 16, 2022) are now guaranteed automatic full relief because their applications missed the settlement’s own deadlines.
- That’s separate from the ~200,000 who got automatic discharge in 2022 and the 271,000+ already relieved as of May 2025 — don’t confuse the numbers.
- Private student loans are never covered by this settlement, regardless of which school you attended.
- Your discharge may be taxable income in 2026 unless it falls under the insolvency exclusion — the ARPA tax-free rule expired at the end of 2025.
- Never pay anyone to “help” with a borrower defense claim — the application and this relief are both free.
The Bottom Line
If you’ve been waiting years for a straight answer on your borrower defense claim, this is about as close to one as the federal courts get to give: the Department of Education has now lost this fight at the district court, at the stay stage, and on the full merits. A rehearing petition or a Supreme Court appeal are technically still on the table, but neither one pauses the relief that’s already back in motion. You didn’t cause the backlog, and you don’t have to do anything heroic to collect what you’re owed — check your notices, verify with your servicer, and don’t let anyone talk you into paying for something that’s already free. I filed my own bankruptcy in 1990 and rebuilt from nothing, so I know the difference between a promise and a discharge you can actually feel in your bank account. This is finally starting to look like the second one. Hang on to your notice, and if you know someone who went to one of these schools and gave up checking their email for updates, this is the week to tell them to look again.
Free Tool — 1099-C Tax Calculator: Received a 1099-C for cancelled debt? The free 1099-C Tax Calculator runs the exact IRS insolvency math from Publication 4681 Worksheet 2 — and covers the partial insolvency case most people miss. Run the Calculator →
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Ninth Circuit rule in Sweet v. McMahon on July 17, 2026?
A three-judge panel unanimously affirmed the district court’s denial of the Department of Education’s motion to modify the settlement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5). The court found the Department failed to show any “significant change either in factual conditions or in law” since it agreed to the settlement in 2022, since the government already knew the size of the Post-Class Applicant group by 2023. The ruling leaves in place automatic full settlement relief for post-class borrowers whose applications weren’t decided by the settlement’s deadlines.
Is it 170,000 or 500,000 borrowers who are getting relief?
Both numbers describe real things, but not the same thing. The 170,000+ figure, confirmed directly by the Project on Predatory Student Lending, is the number of “Post-Class” applicants (who applied June 23–November 16, 2022) now guaranteed automatic relief because of this ruling. The 500,000 figure, used by some news outlets, appears to be a broader estimate of the settlement’s overall reach across its entire history and hasn’t been confirmed against a specific PPSL or court figure I could verify. Treat it as a media estimate, not a count tied to this week’s ruling.
Do I need to do anything to get my loan discharged?
No, if you’re covered by the settlement. Relief is automatic for borrowers whose applications weren’t decided by the deadlines. You should receive (or should already have received) an eligibility notice from the Department of Education, after which the Department has up to one year to deliver the discharge, refund, and credit correction. If you never received a notice by the expected date, check your spam folder first, then email info@ppsl.org with a copy to sweet@ed.gov, including your name and borrower defense application number.
Will I owe taxes on my discharged student loans?
It depends on timing. The American Rescue Plan Act’s tax-free treatment for discharged student loans expired December 31, 2025, and was not extended. If your discharge is processed in 2026, it’s generally treated as taxable cancellation-of-debt income unless you qualify for the insolvency exclusion (IRS Form 982) or can show you were notified of eligibility in 2025. Public Service Loan Forgiveness and disability/death discharges remain tax-free regardless. Check with a tax professional about your specific situation.
What if my loans are private, not federal?
The Sweet v. McMahon settlement only covers federal Direct and FFEL loans. If your loans are private, this settlement doesn’t apply to you at all, regardless of which school you attended or what misconduct occurred. Private student loan borrowers need a different strategy entirely — I’ve written about what actually works for private student loan debt.
One more thing, as always: everything above is what I’m seeing and what I’d tell my own family in this situation, but only you know your full financial picture. Take this as input, not instruction — don’t let anyone, including me, tell you what to do with your money before you’ve looked at your own numbers.
If this saved you from re-reading three conflicting headlines, do me a favor and send it to someone you know who went to one of these schools and gave up checking. A lot of people stopped paying attention to this case years ago because it kept getting delayed — this is the week that changes.
Dealing With Debt? Understanding your options is the first step. See how all your debt relief options compare — including ones most sites won’t tell you about. The Find Your Path quiz gives a recommendation based on your actual numbers, and the Scam-O-Meter checks any company’s complaint history before you sign. CFPB and academic research shows filers recover faster than those who don’t file.
