Sprint Dropped Call on Fair Credit Reporting Act Says FTC

Mobile service provider Sprint will pay $2.95 million in civil penalties to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the company failed to give proper notice to consumers who were placed in a program for customers with lower credit scores and charged an extra monthly fee.

In its complaint, the FTC alleges that Sprint placed consumers with lower credit scores in an Account Spending Limit (ASL) program. The ASL program requires consumers to pay a monthly fee of $7.99 in addition to the charges for cell phone and data services.

“Sprint failed to give many consumers required information about why they were placed in a more costly program, and when they did, the notice often came too late for consumers to choose another mobile carrier,” said Jessica Rich, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “Companies must follow the law when it comes to the way they use consumer credit reports and scores.”

Because Sprint allows customers to be billed for services after they are used, they are subject to the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and its Risk-Based Pricing Rule. The Rule requires that companies inform consumers whenever they are offered service on less favorable terms – such as the ASL program – as a result of information from their credit reports or scores.

The complaint alleges that Sprint in many cases failed to provide consumers placed in the ASL program with all of the disclosures in the required notice, omitting required information that would help consumers understand the information in their credit reports, and that may have alerted them to possible errors that caused them to receive less favorable terms of credit. An FTC study showed credit reports often contain significant errors.

In addition, the complaint alleges that Sprint often provided these notices to consumers after the window in which they could cancel their service and change to another provider without paying an early termination fee, leaving consumers unable to shop for another carrier that may offer them better terms.

See also  Sprint is Chasing Me for an Old Bill I Didn't Authorize. What Can I Do? - Steven

The proposed settlement requires Sprint to pay a $2.95 million penalty for violations of the Risk-Based Pricing Rule. It also requires the company to abide by the Rule’s requirements in the future. In addition, Sprint is required to provide the required notices to consumers within five days of signing up for Sprint service or by a date that gives them the ability to avoid recurring charges like those in the ASL program. Finally, the proposed settlement requires Sprint to send corrected risk-based pricing notices to consumers who received incomplete notices from the company.


1 thought on “Sprint Dropped Call on Fair Credit Reporting Act Says FTC”

  1. Hello Steve, I was one of those charged by Sprint on that account Spending Limit program for almost 9 years! They never told me what that charge was… my wife one day asked my what that charge was after maybe 9 years of service, we called Sprint and then we were informed. Bills charges are often so convoluted with so many taxes that we thought it was a tax. After been so long with them, they insisted I needed to wait at least 6 months or so of not pay late in order for them to remove that charge. So Sprint is charged 2.9M for bad behaviour.. what about returning to us those ill deceptive charges? That just seemed fair. -We are still using Sprint….

    Maybe we should start a group complain towards Sprint regarding this! What do you think?



Leave a Comment