Latest Posts Latest Episodes Free Tools

Vanessa Almazan v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-03004

Active Filed: March 20, 2026 Plaintiff: Vanessa Almazan Court: U.S. District Court (DISTRICT COURT, C.D. CALIFORNIA) Case: 2:26-cv-03004 Last Updated: August 4, 2026

Complaint Not Yet Publicly Available

The complaint in this case has not yet been made publicly available through the federal court system. I only quote directly from publicly released court documents — I do not paraphrase or summarize complaint language.

You can monitor this case and access filings as they are released at the CourtListener docket page. I will update this post when the complaint becomes available.

Quick Answer: A federal court case has been filed involving Midland Credit Management (debt buyer) in U.S. District Court (DISTRICT COURT, C.D. CALIFORNIA). Case number: 2:26-cv-03004. Filed: March 20, 2026. This post will be updated when the complaint becomes publicly available.

Case Update — August 4, 2026

2026-03-23: Doc 2 — Summons Issued — Link

2026-03-23: Doc 3 — Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties — Link

2026-03-23: Doc 4 — Notice of Assignment to United States Judges (CV-18) – optional html form — Link

2026-03-23: Doc 5 — Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) – optional html form — Link

2026-03-23: Doc 6 — Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge – optional html form — Link

2026-03-24: Doc 7 — Order — Link

2026-03-24: Doc 8 — Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint – form only — Link

2026-03-25: Doc 9 — Summons Issued — Link

2026-03-25: Doc 10 — Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) — Link

2026-04-14: Doc 11 — Answer to Complaint (Discovery) — Link

2026-04-14: Doc 12 — Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties — Link

2026-04-15: Doc 13 — Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference – form only — Link

2026-05-22: Doc 15 — Order/Referral to ADR (No 2) (Mediation Panel) (ADR-12) — Link

2026-05-22: Doc 16 — Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive – no proceeding held AND ~Util – Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util – Terminate Hearings — Link

2026-05-22: Doc 14 — Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan — Link

2026-05-26: Doc 17 — Scheduling Order — Link

Case: Vanessa Almazan v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Court: U.S. District Court (DISTRICT COURT, C.D. CALIFORNIA)

Case Number: 2:26-cv-03004

Filed: March 20, 2026

The Daily Money Brief — Free, at 10 AM

Money you may be owed, scams to dodge, and the fine print decoded — the consumer money news that affects your wallet, every weekday.

No spam. Your email stays private.

View case on CourtListener →

Free Newsletter

Your Money Actually

The unfiltered debt takes I can't fit on this site — for people making good money who are still drowning in debt.

Featured in This Week’s Briefing: This case is analyzed in the Debt Relief Insider Compliance Briefing for March 17–March 24, 2026 — risk signals and talking points for debt relief company compliance teams.

Dealing With Debt? Understanding your options is the first step. See how all your debt relief options compare — including ones most sites won’t tell you about. The Find Your Path quiz gives a recommendation based on your actual numbers, and the Scam-O-Meter checks any company’s complaint history before you sign. Federal Reserve research shows bankruptcy filers recover faster than those who don’t file.

About This Coverage

I monitor federal court cases involving debt relief companies as an educational resource for consumers, other companies in the industry, and regulators. This project began on February 27, 2026, and covers cases filed on or after February 20, 2026. Cases filed before that date are not included. I am currently monitoring 334 companies in the debt relief space.

I report on all cases I am able to monitor — no company is singled out or targeted. The goal is comprehensive, fair coverage that helps consumers understand the legal landscape.

Important: The information on this page comes directly from court documents. I present the allegations exactly as stated in those filings — I do not interpret, summarize, or paraphrase complaint language, as doing so could introduce unintended bias. These are allegations, not findings of fact. Every defendant is presumed innocent and has the right to contest the claims in court. A lawsuit is not a finding of wrongdoing.

You can view the full docket at CourtListener.

Are you a party to this case? I welcome statements, corrections, and updates from any party — plaintiff, defendant, or their counsel. If you'd like to add context or a statement for readers, please contact me directly. I will publish it here.

Are you dealing with a debt relief company? If you're considering working with a debt relief company or have already signed a contract, use my free Find Your Path tool to get personalized guidance on your situation.