Latest Posts Latest Episodes Free Tools

David Alvarez v. Resurgent Capital Services L.P., Case No. 2:26-cv-07164

Active Filed: June 29, 2026 Plaintiff: David Alvarez Court: U.S. District Court (DISTRICT COURT, C.D. CALIFORNIA) Case: 2:26-cv-07164 Last Updated: September 5, 2026

Complaint Not Yet Publicly Available

The complaint in this case has not yet been made publicly available through the federal court system. I only quote directly from publicly released court documents — I do not paraphrase or summarize complaint language.

You can monitor this case and access filings as they are released at the CourtListener docket page. I will update this post when the complaint becomes available.

Quick Answer: A federal lawsuit was filed by David Alvarez against Resurgent Capital Services on June 29, 2026 in the U.S. District Court (DISTRICT COURT, C.D. CALIFORNIA). Case No. 2:26-cv-07164. The full complaint has not yet been made available through public court records. This page will be updated with the complete allegations when the complaint is published. This is a legal filing, not a verdict.

Case Update — September 5, 2026

2026-07-09: Doc 4 — Notice of Assignment to United States Judges (CV-18) – optional html form — Link

2026-07-09: Doc 5 — Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) – optional html form — Link

2026-07-09: Doc 6 — Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge – optional html form — Link

2026-07-09: Doc 2 — Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties — Link

2026-07-09: Doc 3 — Proceed In Forma Pauperis — Link

2026-07-10: Doc 7 — Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint – form only — Link

2026-07-30: Doc 8 — Order — Link

2026-08-07: Doc 10 — Amended Complaint — Link

2026-08-07: Doc 11 — Summons Request — Link

2026-08-07: Doc 9 — Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) — Link

2026-08-13: Doc 12 — Proceed In Forma Pauperis AND Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) — Link

2026-08-14: Financial Entry — Link

2026-08-17: Doc 15 — Notice (Other) — Link

2026-08-17: Doc 14 — Summons Issued — Link

2026-09-02: Doc 16 — Leave — Link

2026-09-03: Doc 17 — Notice (Other) — Link

2026-09-04: Doc 18 — Leave — Link

Case Status: The complaint in this case has not yet been uploaded to the RECAP archive. When it becomes available, the full text of the allegations will be reproduced on this page.

To access the complaint directly, you can search for Case No. 2:26-cv-07164 on PACER (the federal court electronic records system). PACER charges $0.10/page, but the first $30/quarter is free for most users.

About This Coverage

I monitor federal court cases involving debt relief companies as an educational resource for consumers, other companies in the industry, and regulators. This project began on February 27, 2026, and covers cases filed on or after February 20, 2026. Cases filed before that date are not included. I am currently monitoring 334 companies in the debt relief space.

I report on all cases I am able to monitor — no company is singled out or targeted. The goal is comprehensive, fair coverage that helps consumers understand the legal landscape.

Important: The information on this page comes directly from court documents. I present the allegations exactly as stated in those filings — I do not interpret, summarize, or paraphrase complaint language, as doing so could introduce unintended bias. These are allegations, not findings of fact. Every defendant is presumed innocent and has the right to contest the claims in court. A lawsuit is not a finding of wrongdoing.

You can view the full docket at CourtListener.

Are you a party to this case? I welcome statements, corrections, and updates from any party — plaintiff, defendant, or their counsel. If you'd like to add context or a statement for readers, please contact me directly. I will publish it here.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why doesn’t this page have the full complaint yet?

Federal court complaints are filed through the PACER system. They become available for free public access when they are uploaded to the RECAP archive (a free, open repository of federal court documents). Not all filings are uploaded immediately. When this complaint becomes available, the full text will be added to this page.

Has Resurgent Capital Services been found liable?

No. A complaint is a legal filing that contains allegations. Resurgent Capital Services has not been found liable for any wrongdoing. Courts require proof before entering judgment.

The Daily Money Brief — Free, at 10 AM

Money you may be owed, scams to dodge, and the fine print decoded — the consumer money news that affects your wallet, every weekday.

No spam. Your email stays private.

Source: CourtListener — David Alvarez v. Resurgent Capital Services L.P., Docket 73594527. This case is being tracked for updates.

Free Newsletter

Your Money Actually

The unfiltered debt takes I can't fit on this site — for people making good money who are still drowning in debt.

Dealing With Debt? Understanding your options is the first step. See how all your debt relief options compare — including ones most sites won’t tell you about. The Find Your Path quiz gives a recommendation based on your actual numbers, and the Scam-O-Meter checks any company’s complaint history before you sign. Federal Reserve research shows bankruptcy filers recover faster than those who don’t file.

Are you dealing with a debt relief company? If you're considering working with a debt relief company or have already signed a contract, use my free Find Your Path tool to get personalized guidance on your situation.