Complaint Not Yet Publicly Available
The complaint in this case has not yet been made publicly available through the federal court system. I only quote directly from publicly released court documents — I do not paraphrase or summarize complaint language.
You can monitor this case and access filings as they are released at the CourtListener docket page. I will update this post when the complaint becomes available.
Quick Answer: A federal lawsuit was filed by Pennington Thurman against OneMain Financial on July 10, 2026 in the U.S. District Court (DISTRICT COURT, E.D. MISSOURI). Case No. 4:26-cv-01076. The full complaint has not yet been made available through public court records. This page will be updated with the complete allegations when the complaint is published. This is a legal filing, not a verdict.
Case Update — September 9, 2026
2026-07-10: Case Opening Notification — Link
2026-07-10: Doc 3 — Complaint (Removal/Transfer) – COURT USE ONLY — Link
2026-07-10: Doc 2 — DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP LLC, OneMain Financial Holdings, LLC.. (Stavely, Jason) (Entered: 07/10/2026) — Link
2026-07-15: Doc 4 — Remand to State Court — Link
2026-07-15: Doc 5 — Memorandum in Support of Motion — Link
2026-07-17: Doc 6 — Compel — Link
2026-07-17: Doc 7 — Declaration — Link
2026-07-21: Doc 8 — Memorandum in Opposition to Motion — Link
2026-07-29: Doc 9 — Memorandum in Opposition to Motion — Link
2026-07-31: Doc 10 — Reply to Response to Motion — Link
2026-09-08: Doc 11 — MEMORANDUM AND ORDER….IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Wilma Pennington Thurman’s Motion to Remand 4 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant OneMain Financial Group, LLC’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Pro ceedings 6 is GRANTED, and the parties are directed to arbitration under the arbitration clause of the Loan Agreement at issue in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED pending completion of arbitration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall administratively close this case, subject to the right of the parties to move to reopen it, if appropriate, upon completion of arbitration. Signed by Sr. District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/8/2026. (LCR) — Link
📄 Download document from CourtListener →
2026-09-08: Order Receipt — Link
Case Status: The complaint in this case has not yet been uploaded to the RECAP archive. When it becomes available, the full text of the allegations will be reproduced on this page.
To access the complaint directly, you can search for Case No. 4:26-cv-01076 on PACER (the federal court electronic records system). PACER charges $0.10/page, but the first $30/quarter is free for most users.
About This Coverage
I monitor federal court cases involving debt relief companies as an educational resource for consumers, other companies in the industry, and regulators. This project began on February 27, 2026, and covers cases filed on or after February 20, 2026. Cases filed before that date are not included. I am currently monitoring 334 companies in the debt relief space.
I report on all cases I am able to monitor — no company is singled out or targeted. The goal is comprehensive, fair coverage that helps consumers understand the legal landscape.
Important: The information on this page comes directly from court documents. I present the allegations exactly as stated in those filings — I do not interpret, summarize, or paraphrase complaint language, as doing so could introduce unintended bias. These are allegations, not findings of fact. Every defendant is presumed innocent and has the right to contest the claims in court. A lawsuit is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can view the full docket at CourtListener.
Are you a party to this case? I welcome statements, corrections, and updates from any party — plaintiff, defendant, or their counsel. If you'd like to add context or a statement for readers, please contact me directly. I will publish it here.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why doesn’t this page have the full complaint yet?
Federal court complaints are filed through the PACER system. They become available for free public access when they are uploaded to the RECAP archive (a free, open repository of federal court documents). Not all filings are uploaded immediately. When this complaint becomes available, the full text will be added to this page.
Has OneMain Financial been found liable?
No. A complaint is a legal filing that contains allegations. OneMain Financial has not been found liable for any wrongdoing. Courts require proof before entering judgment.
The Daily Money Brief — Free, at 10 AM
Money you may be owed, scams to dodge, and the fine print decoded — the consumer money news that affects your wallet, every weekday.
Source: CourtListener — Pennington Thurman v. OneMain Financial Group LLC, Docket 73599396. This case is being tracked for updates.
Dealing With Debt? Understanding your options is the first step. See how all your debt relief options compare — including ones most sites won’t tell you about. The Find Your Path quiz gives a recommendation based on your actual numbers, and the Scam-O-Meter checks any company’s complaint history before you sign. Federal Reserve research shows bankruptcy filers recover faster than those who don’t file.
Part of the Federal Lawsuits Database
This case is one of 353 federal court cases involving debt relief companies tracked at Federal Lawsuits Against Debt Relief Companies. Browse by company type, legal claim, or alleged conduct to identify industry-wide patterns.
Are you dealing with a debt relief company? If you're considering working with a debt relief company or have already signed a contract, use my free Find Your Path tool to get personalized guidance on your situation.
