Date Received: 2018-10-25T00:00:00.000
Product: Mortgage debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Consumer Consent Provided to Share Complaint: Consent provided
Consumer Complaint: On XX/XX/XXXX a friend/family member was searching the web and they found my address and home listed as a pre foreclosure. When in fact my home has been paid off since XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX along with others being sued now in court for this slanderous act has added a 7th Trustee named Trustee : National Default Servicing Corp XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX, XXXX, AZ XXXX Phone : ( XXXX ) XXXX. The first alleged Trustee was 1. ] Title company no longer in business as of XX/XX/XXXX, 2nd. ] XXXX a fraudulent company whom listed themselves under XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX whom was found to be fraud by the SEC in XX/XX/XXXX. 3rd. ] XXXX 4th. ] XXXX and subsidiaries unknown, 5th. XXXX XXXX XXXX not XXXX XXXX but XXXX XXXX XXXX unknown and fraudulent. 6. ] was XXXX 7. ] is National Default Servicing Corp. A lien was placed upon the property by a XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX formerly of a out of business company named XXXX XXXX XXXX as of XX/XX/XXXX whom both now are currently working and well hidden within XXXX XXXX. i XXXX XXXX XXXX own the property and have done so legally and since XX/XX/XXXX. Any attempts of pre-foreclosures have added all parties to current law suits in ninth circuit and new cases complaint being filed at this time for trespassing and i have a 9 billion USDA lien on my home against anyone whom attempts to take my property, you are now being put on notice. Your partner XXXX should have warned you of the current cases but they did not and now you are added along with all personnel realtors title companies and such the like. As of XX/XX/XXXX a QWR and a cease and desist was given to all parties as well No genuine issues produced by the companies involved but they claim to be erroneously sued when in fact they have been in communications with the Appellants since XX/XX/XXXX concerning these matters. The original cease and desist was given via the QWR aka qualified written request and thereafter. All parties have been served the cease and desist over and over again due to the amount of added changes to the defendants roster. They add someone every six months it seems. The evidence provided by the Appellants are clear and undisputed. The Defendants provided the addresses and locations of where to send complaints, forms and letters and such was used to show proof of service thereto all the Appellees. The appeals court can see clearly the evidence of the documents statements affidavits and claims provided are clear and undisputed by the Appellees and the use or attempt to dismiss the case before being argued before the panel and this court is obstruction of justice and failure to due process. Therefore a hearing must be set so that the evidence can be made clear and the Appellants can defend and oppose all that was submitted to the courts and not to the appellees as of XX/XX/XXXX. This case is now in XXXX Circuit court of appeals and thereafter if needed it shall be in the US SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS.
XXXX asked me the home owner to give them consent to foreclose on my home and i say again they asked me for consent which i will never give the answer was no and its still no.
XXXX produced fraudulent documents alleging a loan took place but they are four to five different copies the 1st. ] has a date on top with a bar code, the 2nd. ] has no date but adds new signatures, the 3rd has initials at the bottom the fourth has altered dates and newly added loan numbers the fifth is blank.
XXXX claims to the XXXX XXXX County Registrar office that they have served a Default notice to my home and i swear no notice has ever been served to my property.
The newly added Trustee has been added to the multi million dollar suit.
For more information go to the courts website and look up case number i, woman, XXXX XXXX XXXX i, man, XXXX XXXX XXXX Court Of Appeal No. XXXX District Court No. – XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX et al.,, 2 ; XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX not limited to employees and acquired ) XX/XX/XXXX banks involved ) FAIURE OF DUE PROCESS defendants ( s ) and appellee
Company: National Default Servicing Corporation
State/Zip: CA 935XX
Company Response to Complaint: Closed with explanation
Was Company Response Timely: Yes
Did Consumer Dispute Company Response: N/A
Complaint ID: 3056670
The above data is from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Keep in mind that every company will get a complaint from time-to-time, even the great ones. But there are a few key data points that will give you an idea about how well the company values their customers and handles consumer issues.
Look at the item Company Response to Complaint: and Did Consumer Dispute Company Response: to get a better idea of how this was resolved. And the field Consumer Complaint: can give you some context of the issue.
In particular what you are looking for was that the company response was timely and that the consumer did not dispute it. The posting of complaints has proven to be a valuable resource for both companies and consumers.
