Better Debt Solutions and LendVia Sued for Illegal Robocalls

Case Information

  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • Case No.: 8:25-cv-00180-DOC-ADS
  • Filing Date: January 30, 2025
  • Plaintiff: Jacob Lowry
  • Defendants: Better Debt Solutions, LLC; LendVia, LLC
  • Legal Representation: Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.

Allegations at a Glance

Plaintiff Jacob Lowry alleges that Better Debt Solutions and its marketing partner, LendVia, engaged in illegal telemarketing practices. He claims the companies used robocalls and an automatic dialing system to repeatedly contact him despite his lack of consent and his phone number being on the National Do Not Call Registry. The complaint asserts these calls violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

Key Allegations

  • Defendants used an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) to send robocalls and pre-recorded messages.
  • Plaintiff never provided consent for such calls.
  • Plaintiff repeatedly requested to be placed on the defendants’ internal Do-Not-Call list, but the calls continued.
  • Defendants called Plaintiff multiple times a day, using different area codes and disguised numbers.
  • Plaintiff’s phone number was registered on the National Do Not Call Registry, yet he continued to receive solicitation calls.
  • Defendants failed to implement proper procedures to prevent unlawful telemarketing.

Legal Claims

Negligent Violations of the TCPA (47 U.S.C. § 227(b) & § 227(c))
Willful Violations of the TCPA (47 U.S.C. § 227(b) & § 227(c))

Relief Sought

💰 Statutory damages of $500 per negligent violation and up to $1,500 per willful violation
💰 Treble damages for knowing and willful violations
⚖️ Injunctive relief to prevent further unlawful robocalls

The Bottom Line

Lowry claims that Better Debt Solutions and LendVia engaged in repeated and unlawful robocalls despite clear regulations prohibiting such practices. If successful, the lawsuit could result in significant financial penalties and increased scrutiny on the defendants’ marketing practices.

Legal Disclaimer

This lawsuit contains allegations that have yet to be proven in court. The case may result in a settlement, dismissal, or judgment.

author avatar
Research Department Automated Research
The Research Department provides clear, fact-based summaries of newly filed legal complaints, highlighting key case details, allegations, and legal claims. These reports focus strictly on the claims made in court filings and do not include responses from defendants. Committed to neutrality and readability, the Research Department ensures that legal disputes are documented in an accessible, structured format without speculation on case outcomes. 📌 Important Note: Lawsuits are allegations and may be dismissed, settled, or withdrawn.

Leave a Comment