Subscribe to our mailing list

X

Mass Joinder – Tort Litigation Victim Updates. Kramer & Kaslow, Mitchell Stein, Esq, Mesa Law

By on August 17, 2011
Mass Joinder – Tort Litigation Victim Updates. Kramer & Kaslow, Mitchell Stein, Esq, Mesa Law

This page is for people who want updates on the following three legal entities that were raided by the California Bar today in an effort to shutdown the mass joinder marketing operations that were selling consumers access to a lawsuit against their lender.

To receive updates, please subscribe to the comments below. As new information become available I’ll update this page and post a comment below to let you know to come back for an update posted.

Kramer & Kaslow and Phillip Kramer, Esq. Updates

August 17, 2010 – Offices raided by California Bar.

Law Office of Mitchell Stein and Mitchell Stein, Esq. Updates

August 17, 2010 – Offices raided by California Bar.

Mesa Law Updates

August 17, 2010 – Offices raided by California Bar.


READ  My Problem is With Mitchell Stein and Kramer-Kaslow. - Char

Last step, fill out the information below or call us for Priority Assistance.

What problems are you having with your report?

Your first name is required. Your first name is required to be at least 2 characters. Your first name cannot be longer than 50 characters.
Your last name is required. Your last name is required to be at least 2 characters. Your last name cannot be longer than 50 characters.
Your email is required.
Your phone is required. Your 10 digit phone number is required.
Your state is required.
Your age is required. Your age must be greater than 18. Your age must be less than 100.

By clicking on the "Contact Me" button above, you consent, acknowledge, and agree to the following: Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and to receive electronic communications. We take your privacy seriously. That you are providing express "written" consent for Debt.com or appropriate service provider(s) to call you (including through automated means; e.g. autodialing, text and pre-recorded messaging) via telephone, mobile device (including SMS and MMS - charges may apply), even if your telephone number is currently listed on any internal, corporate, state or federal Do-Not-Call list. Consent is not required as a condition to utilize Debt.com services and you are under no obligation to purchase anything.

By clicking on the “Contact me” button above, you consent, acknowledge, and agree to the following: (1)That you are providing express “written” consent for Lexington Law Firm, Debt.com or appropriate service provider(s) to call you (including through automated means; e.g. autodialing, text and pre-recorded messaging) via telephone, mobile device (including SMS and MMS – charges may apply), or dialed manually, at my residential or cellular number, even if your telephone number is currently listed on any internal, corporate, state or federal Do-Not-Call list; and (2)Lexington Law’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and Debt.com’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Consent is not required as a condition to utilize Lexington Law or Debt.com services and you are under no obligation to purchase anything.

About Steve Rhode

Steve Rhode is the Get Out of Debt Guy and has been helping good people with bad debt problems since 1994. You can learn more about Steve, here.

18 Comments

  1. Daveraibley

    October 5, 2011 at 6:35 am

    okay the TRO expired 9-31-2011. Have the lawyers been charged have their files been released or can th ecase move forward against the banks?

  2. Koldesigns

    August 24, 2011 at 11:26 pm

    were the raids conducted back in  in 2010????

  3. statusquo

    August 20, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    now what?   the state/fed takes over the case?  isnt that the fox guarding the hen house?

  4. OhBoy

    August 19, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    FROM JOHN WRIGHT- No info on his sight regarding any of this tho- JeffreyApril 8, 2011 at 11:59 amThanks John,I asked one of Phillip Kramer’s associates the same question and this is their reply.=======================================Two years ago Mitchell J. Stein, three other attorneys and Mitchell’s friend and colleague Philip Kramer put their heads together and came up with a lawsuit to force the banks to make the loan mods that they were no longer making and to punish them for defying the law.So the first case was Ronald v. BofA, which is now two year old and on it’s fifth amendment. That was
    the “test case” and now that it has passed nearly half a dozen legal hurdles, Mr. Kramer filed his own case against BofA (as well as five others against the likes of Chase, Wells, Citi and OneWest.)I don’t know the story behind Brookstone Law – if there is any connection with Stein or Kramer – but evidently they liked what they saw with Ronald and decided to
    file their own.I don’t think that the date of filing makes any difference. If Brookstone loses it would not prevent Ronald or Maxam from winning.So the only honest advise I can give you is that you would want to go with who you feel is the best lawyer because – and I’ve been told this by judges – if a case goes to trial it is a close case, and the best lawyer wins. So look at the lawyer bios, etc. and go with what feels right.

    • OhBoy

      August 19, 2011 at 5:22 pm

      HIS REPLY- John WrightApril 8, 2011 at 6:12 pmThat sounded like a very good answer.
      .
      Mr. Spivak will be the lead counsel on my case, in which I have been told by
      all the advocates that he has the best reputation. However, I have heard
      that Stein has most experience, whereas I have heard Kramer is just “ok,”
      but has a lot of controversy surrounding him regarding mailers or something.
      .
      Thanks for sharing !
      .
      My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!.John Wrightpiggybankblog.com

    • Yougotbustedscamming

      August 20, 2011 at 1:26 am

      That OneWest case is about the anger because his wife;s housewas foreclosed in Arizona. That case was started as his wife’s business name, Robany,  then it was resubmitted under her name as Tracey Hampton-Stein. That B of A lawsuit lists his wife as Tracey Hampton and she’s suppose to get a chunk out of that case. Even if won, that money would not  be equally distributed among homeowners. The AG did exactly what they should had done. These cases may had started legitimately but they became just another way to make money after a while. I guess that’s why Stein is claiming to make over $70mil off these lawsuit in the bankruptcy he filed. I guess when you brag you in articles listing your family’s names and their relationship with a former presidential family it’s kind of easy to finger out who are some of these lead plaintiffs.

      http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20CACO%2020110506029.xml

      http://oag.ca.gov/news/press_release?id=2552&

      • Serious

        August 13, 2015 at 9:34 am

        They had the Arizona home under contract at $1 million plus. They lost the AZ home because they didn’t pay. Could have made money! Rather than close a million dollar deal they let it go to the bank who sold it for $350,000

  5. Fred

    August 19, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    I question what right the AG has to take away the Legal Representation of the Plaintiffs in these cases with only an accusation.

    • Steve Rhode

      August 19, 2011 at 2:33 pm

      Good question. I think a lot of your questions will be answered by reading the details on the lawsuit filed. You can read all of that here.

  6. Steve Rhode

    August 18, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    California Attorney General releases information on mass joinder raids, See this article.

  7. Joe

    August 18, 2011 at 7:41 pm

    This is another balck eye for the California legal profession.  The mass joinder approach was ill conceived from the beginning and the legal theory was overly ambititious.  The subprime mortgage culture continues to infect the legal profession.

    The only reasonable way to represent homeowner’s in financial distress is one client at a time.  Like a doctor’s diagnosis, the relationship should start with an individual drill down by an experienced practitionor…not a sales pitch from a greedy telemarketer hell bent on banging credit cards.  There are no silver bullets.

    J. Arthur Roberts, Esq
    HomeLawLawyers.com 

  8. Question

    August 18, 2011 at 3:05 pm

    What happens when a law office is raided by the bar?

  9. Phil

    August 18, 2011 at 4:13 am

    2011 retard.

Share a Comment / Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: