The Ninth Circuit’s July 17, 2026 ruling rejected the Department of Education’s appeal in Sweet v. McMahon. Here’s who gets automatic discharge and who doesn’t.
Sweet v. McMahon borrower defense deadline is April 15, 2026. Here’s who qualifies for automatic student loan discharge and exactly what to do now.
Quick Answer: The FTC is sending 14,521 refund checks totaling over $822,000 to victims of Student Advocates’ debt-relief scam. The scheme charged illegal upfront fees while falsely promising to lower student loan payments, but none of the collected money was actually paid toward consumers’ loans.The Federal Trade Commission is sending 14,521 checks totaling more than …
Quick Answer: My Education Solutions customers seeking refunds should follow a step-by-step escalation process, starting with giving the company a second chance to resolve the issue before pursuing other options. The company remains operational despite past legal issues, and a systematic approach increases chances of recovering fees.Question:Dear Steve,Hello, my wife signed up with My Education …
Quick Answer: Sarah Kim settled in the CFPB case against Consumer Advocacy Center and Premier Student Loan Center, forfeiting luxury assets including a Rolex and Bentley. The multi-state lawsuit seeks injunctive relief, restitution, and civil penalties against multiple defendants involved in alleged student loan servicing violations.In the CFPB case against Consumer Advocacy Center, Premier Student …
Quick Answer: Consumer Advocacy Center and its numerous associated entities have closed after lawsuits filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and three states in 2019. TAS 2019 LLC, part of the student loan help network, recently agreed to a stipulated final judgment in the case.It looks as if the end of the road has …
Quick Answer: Student Loan Movement appears to have mixed legitimacy, with the BBB giving them an F rating despite some successful loan forgiveness cases. The company’s lack of transparency about services and fees raises red flags, so clients should review their agreements and verify exactly what services they’re paying for.Question:Dear Steve,I believe a friend may …
Quick Answer: The Department of Education announced new criminal penalties for unauthorized third parties accessing student loan systems, including fines up to $20,000 and imprisonment up to five years. Nonprofit organizations providing loan counseling are exempt if they obtain proper third-party access credentials through authorized channels.The Department of Education has just announced a new policy …
Quick Answer: Student loan debt relief companies include both legitimate services and scams, with California’s DFPI recently requiring Amerifed Doc Prep LLC to pay $1.37 million in penalties and refunds for illegal advance fees. Borrowers should contact the U.S. Department of Education or their loan servicer directly rather than third-party debt relief companies.The California Department …
Quick Answer: The FTC settled with Student Advocates Team and related companies for charging illegal upfront fees and falsely promising to eliminate student loan debt. The defendants are permanently banned from debt relief services and face a $24.5 million judgment, though they’ll only pay $11,500 due to inability to pay.The operators of a student loan …
Did this conversation help?
Thank you. I'm glad you reached out.
You took an important step today. Come back any time.
Think of this as me — just in AI form. I've walked in your shoes. I filed bankruptcy myself in 1990, and in over 30 years of experience I haven't seen a situation that can't be worked through or a person who deserves judgment. Everything here is built on that experience, that research, and genuine care for you. I can't be there in person. But I can be here.
Conversations are saved anonymously. Personal details are automatically removed before storage. This is an AI — not a financial advisor, attorney, or therapist.
Not sure where to start?
Been here before?
